This article is more than
2 year oldThe Matrix Resurrections co-producer Village Roadshow Entertainment Group is taking Warner Bros. to court over its dismal debut.
The production company has alleged that the film’s distributor breached contract when they decided on a dual-release in the US, in cinemas and to stream on HBO Max, according to a complaint The Wall Street Journalreported was filed at the Los Angeles Superior Court on Monday.
In fact, Warner Media ordered its entire 2021 roster to be released on their sister platform HBO Max, while moving up the release date for The Matrix Resurrections from its originally scheduled 2022 premiere to December 2021, lawyers for Village Roadshow claimed in the filing, reported by Page Six.
Stream more entertainment news live & on demand with Flash, a dedicated news streaming service. New to Flash? Try 14 days free now >
Village Roadshow also claims to be the victim of “rampant piracy” facilitated by the streaming release, adding that Warner Bros. could have foreseen the potential consequences that “come by distributing this marquee picture on a streaming platform on the same day as its theatrical release,” and moved forward with plans anyway.
The fourth Matrix instalment starring Keanu Reeves and Carrie-Anne Moss grossed a paltry $US10.7 million ($A15 million) during its opening weekend in America – a fraction of what the preceding trilogy achieved, despite showing in more cinemas than ever before.
The lawsuit comes as the latest in an ongoing debate within the industry over a recent shift to prioritise direct-to-consumer streaming apps during the pandemic, which all but shuttered cinemas globally for nearly two years.
In 2021, Marvel’s Black Widow star Scarlett Johansson sued Disney, also claiming that the superhero flick’s dual-release hurt ticket sales, on which a portion of her pay cheque was contingent. Johansson and Disney settled two months later for an undisclosed amount.
Meanwhile, films chosen to move forward with an exclusive theatrical release in 2021 fared well despite the wait for streaming audiences. Spider-Man: No Way Home, for example, brought in $US260 million ($A364 million) at the US box office during its premiere weekend.
In a statement for WSJ, a spokesperson for Warner Bros. has said the production company has overstepped their contract’s arbitration clause with the suit: “This is a frivolous attempt by Village Roadshow to avoid their contractual commitment to participate in the arbitration that we commenced against them last week.
“We have no doubt that this case will be resolved in our favour.”
Warner was previously in hot water over its decision to release its 2021 line-up for streaming, and was forced to renegotiate contracts with much of its talent as a result, costing the studio more than $US200 million ($A280 million), according to WSJ.
However, The Matrix Resurrections was apparently excluded from those talks.
Village Roadshow has also alleged that Warner Bros. means to cut them out of their future endeavours involving shared interests, for which they’ve already invested $US4.5 billion ($A6.3 billion). The two companies previously worked together on recent hits including Joker and American Sniper, as well as the Matrix franchise.
“WB has also been devising various schemes to deprive Village Roadshow of its continuing rights to co-own and co-invest in the derivative works from the films it co-owns,” they wrote.
When Village Roadshow recently refused to give up the rights to a TV series based on the Tom Cruise-Emily Blunt sci-fi flick Edge of Tomorrow, Warner Bros., according to the suit, “said the quiet part out loud: It will not allow Village Roadshow to benefit from any of its Derivative Rights going forward, despite the over $4.5 billion it has paid WB to make and distribute 91 films.”
“In other words, if Village Roadshow won’t give up its rights,” they added, “WB will make sure they are worth nothing.”
This article originally appeared on Page Six and was republished with permission
20/11/2024
14/11/2024
14/11/2024
Newer articles
<p>A US judge has ruled against Donald Trump getting his hush money conviction thrown out on immunity grounds.</p>