Europeans explore troops for Ukraine ceasefire — and want U.S. support

The Trump administration has been seeking to learn what forces and weapons European countries could commit, while the Europeans, for their part, have been sounding out the Trump team about what kind of military backing would be available, for instance intelligence or air defenses.

After the hours-long meeting, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz said he welcomed talks about developing a peace agreement but said, “This does not mean that there can be a dictated peace and that Ukraine must accept what is presented to it.” Ukraine must be able to continue on a path toward membership in the European Union, be able to defend its democracy and sovereignty, and maintain a strong army, he said.

Scholz also stressed the need for Europe and the United States to present a common front. “There must be no division of security and responsibility between Europe and the USA. This means that NATO is based on the fact that we always act together and take risks together and thereby ensure our security,” he said.

While Washington has ruled out U.S. troops in Ukraine, European officials say the Trump team has not excluded the prospect of supporting a European force and has asked what kind of U.S. backing might be necessary.

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced for the first time Sunday night that he was ready to deploy British boots in Ukraine as part of a deal “if necessary,” which could pressure other European leaders to make similar pledges. He said he did not take lightly the decision to put British service members “in harm’s way” but that “any role in helping to guarantee Ukraine’s security is helping to guarantee the security of our continent.”

When asked about whether Germany would deploy its soldiers, Scholz said it was “completely premature” to have the discussion. “For me it is quite clear that this is an inappropriate debate at the wrong time and about the wrong topic. We are not yet at peace but in the middle of a brutal war,” he added.

France and Britain, the only two nuclear powers among the Europeans, have been at the forefront of the discussions, which have involved at least a dozen countries, including Poland, the Netherlands, Germany, and Nordic and Baltic states.

As Trump promised a deal to halt the war, European allies recently grew more open to the idea of sending in troops, which had triggered uproar when France’s Macron first suggested it last year.

European leaders have quietly held discussions on troops in Ukraine for months but have yet to draft a concrete plan, with some countries hesitant about committing troops or moving forward without more clarity from the United States about its intentions for Ukraine.

The European plans have gained greater urgency as Trump officials landed on the continent this month and made clear that Washington is more than willing to move without them.

European allies have been split on the nature of a deployment, including the force’s size and mandate and the extent of U.S. backing needed. Attempts to make military plans are also hamstrung by the fact that the parameters of a deal with Russia — such as the lines along which the conflict might be frozen — remain elusive or have not been fully articulated by the Trump team.

Still, officials agree that U.S. support would be critical and that they would welcome clear warnings from Washington to Russia, publicly or privately, against any attempts to attack the force or reignite a full-blown conflict.

Another key question for the Europeans is how to respond if Russia were to attack the force. One proposal was for a mutual-defense clause among countries involved in the European coalition, which would not operate under the NATO flag.

“It should be clear that the force is ready to hit back if it’s hit, and it should be able to ramp up quickly,” said a European diplomat.

“In a normal world, it would be too early to plan without the ceasefire conditions. But they are going to negotiate over our heads,” the diplomat added. “This is a means to say to the U.S. we are ready to give this if you do that.”

For many European states, a deployment would also require public support at home and draw on already stretched military resources. France has more leeway than others, including Britain, in freeing up troops, partly because of a French drawdown in Africa.

Some countries, such as Poland or Germany, have national elections coming up and are wary of making big moves at a time when Russia’s war in Ukraine has become more politicized. Some have also been nervous about taking risks without greater U.S. involvement. And the Netherlands, for example, will need approval from parliament.

“We do not plan to send Polish soldiers to Ukraine, but we will support, including in terms of logistics and political backing, the countries that may wish to provide such guarantees in the future,” Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk said Monday.

 

 

Chicken and the egg

 

The European idea also centers on boosting weapons and training for the Ukrainian army so it can hold what is expected to be an unstable ceasefire line. It could become a sticking point in negotiations as Moscow demands that Ukraine significantly reduce its military.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said Monday that he believes “we have made significant progress on the issue” of European troops in Ukraine, which he described as a coalition of the willing. “We want security guarantees not on paper, but on the ground, at sea, in the air,” he said.

Asked whether Russia would be ready for a European deployment in Ukraine, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said it was “a very difficult question” on which there have been “no substantive discussions” so far. “It’s difficult to speak about that as it will be NATO member states and, thus, NATO forces deployed on Ukraine’s territory,” he said.

Keith Kellogg, Trump’s special envoy to Ukraine and Russia, visited NATO headquarters on Monday and will tour some capitals this week, when European officials expect to talk about a division of labor with the United States in Ukraine.

A Western diplomat described the talks with the Americans so far as “a chicken-and-egg game,” with each side waiting for the other to show their cards before declaring what resources they could commit.

Others believe the plan would give Europeans a key to shape the negotiations and lock Trump in because he would be loath to appear weak if the force is attacked and his deal unravels. “What would happen if they get attacked and Trump does nothing, it would look so bad for him,” a Western official said.

European officials say they have received mixed messages from members of the Trump team as they try to gauge who does what and how much sway each could have with the president.

“There are different views in the Trump camp … and at the end of the day, he’s the one who decides,” a second European diplomat said. “It could all change with a social media post.”

Serhiy Morgunov in Kyiv and Natalia Abbakumova in Riga, Latvia, contributed to this report.