Lebron James' decision to leave the Cavaliers for the Lakers isn't surprising — but his 2010 move changed the NBA forever

Source: NBC News::

July 2, 2018 at 22:13

James awaiting the inevitable during game four of the 2018 NBA Finals on June 8, 2018 in Cleveland, Ohio. Jason Miller / Getty Images

Whether or not you like the Lakers, or even whether or not you like Lebron, his influence on the league has been inarguable and positive.

Eight years ago, LeBron James, granted his freedom to choose his NBA employer for the first time in a career that had already earned him two MVP awards and that had energized the previously moribund Cleveland Cavaliers, announced that he was leaving Cleveland and joining his friend Dwyane Wade and the Miami Heat. Or, as James put it at the time, “taking my talents to South Beach.”

It is difficult to recall a bigger public relations fiasco for a superstar athlete that didn’t involve a felony charge. James was vivisected by Cleveland fans (who burned his jersey in the streets), by then-NBA commissioner David Stern (who called the decision “ill-conceived”), by Michael Jordan himself (who mocked James by noting that he’d never join up with his rivals; he’d try to beat them) and by essentially every sportswriter on the planet, to whom James had just handed an easy half-decade of hot takes. One of these sportswriters was me, who wrote that what became known as simply "The Decision" “treated the millions of people watching like stupid, mindless consumers, empty lemmings ready to follow Sport into the abyss.”

Today, with the news that James is leaving Cleveland — again — after signing a four-year, $153.3 million contract with the Los Angeles Lakers, I think it’s probably time to admit we got all the whole thing wrong. Sure, the optics of that night eight years ago remain pretty gross, with James framing a cold-blooded business decision as a prime-time special complete with advertisements for his own products and the University of Phoenix, of all things. All this while breaking his fanbase’s heart with phrasing that sounded like he just wanted to party for a couple of years. But the idea that we were all so angry with James for finally taking control of his own career and making decisions that were right for him, not for the billionaire owners thriving because of his talents and labors, seems absurd, reductionist and flat wrong today.

The reaction so far to James’ Lakers deal is more muted, for sure. Part of this is because it’s not much of a surprise — once a leaver, always a leaver, particularly when the Cavaliers looked so feeble around him during the 2018 NBA Finals. But there’s also a sense that during the better part of the last decade professional basketball has changed a lot. And James himself is the primary reason for that.

In the eight years since James’ decision, the idea of athlete autonomy has caught on in the public consciousness.

Indeed, in the eight years since James’ decision, the idea of athlete autonomy — of a player having more control and power over his or her own career, of not just being an employee of an owner who is not the one out running and dunking — has caught on in the public consciousness in a way it had failed to before. James’ move was the instigating act.

When James went to Miami to create his superteam, it led to other superteams, some successful, some not. (Derrick Rose at one point thought his New York Knicks were a superteam, which just makes you sad). It led unquestionably to the Golden State Warriors, the true dynasty of this era. Without James’ move, it’s unlikely that Kevin Durant, perhaps the game’s second-best player, would have ever gone to the Warriors — a team that had already won one championship, a team that is renowned for its chemistry and faith in its players rather than an utilitarian top-down system, a team with a coach who will tell anyone who will listen that it’s a player’s league, not a coach’s one.

Miami Heat's LeBron James — James shoots over Boston Celtics' Paul Pierce and Kevin Garnett, while playing for the Miami Heat on Oct. 26, 2010.Winslow Townson / AP file

An argument can be made of course that superteams are bad for the sport; many NBA fans don’t like that Golden State is such heavy favorites every year. But rising NBA ratings and the sport’s cultural ubiquity hardly are indicators of a league receding.

The NBA union has also grown more powerful since The Decision, and, tellingly, the NBA itself has ceded to athlete empowerment, selling individual players rather than teams and encouraging players to express themselves both on and off the court. The NFL will fine players who don’t stand for the flag; the NBA’s biggest star can call the president of the United States “U bum” on Twitter, and be praised almost unilaterally among NBA circles for it. (It even shut Trump up.) The NBA is a player’s league now, and it’s better for it.

Read More (...)