Vidostream | News, sport and opinion from the Vidostream's US edition

https://vidostream.com

Amber Heard can’t afford to pay Johnny Depp, will appeal verdict: lawyer

In a TV interview, Amber Heard’s lawyer says the actress can’t afford to pay Johnny Depp millions in damages and will appeal the verdict.
Amber Heard's lawyer says she can't afford to pay Johnny Depp and will appeal. Pictures: AFP

Amber Heard's lawyer says she can't afford to pay Johnny Depp and will appeal. Pictures: AFP

Actress Amber Heard is unable to pay her ex-husband Johnny Depp more than $10 million in damages, her lawyer said Friday (AEST), after a US jury took the side of the Pirates of the Caribbean star in a bitter defamation trial.

The high-profile televised court battle ended Thursday when a seven-person jury found that Depp and Heard had defamed each other, but weighed in far more strongly with Depp.

The jury, after a six-week trial featuring claims and counterclaims of domestic abuse, awarded him $10.35 million in damages, in contrast with $2 million awarded to Heard.

Asked on NBC’s TODAY show if Heard will be able to pay up, her lawyer Elaine Bredehoft said: “Oh no, absolutely not.”

She added that the Aquaman star will appeal the verdict and “has some excellent grounds for it”.
 

Amber Heard testifies during the Depp vs Heard defamation trial at the Fairfax County Circuit Court in Fairfax, Virginia. (Photo by Michael REYNOLDS / POOL / AFP)
Amber Heard testifies during the Depp vs Heard defamation trial at the Fairfax County Circuit Court in Fairfax, Virginia. (Photo by Michael REYNOLDS / POOL / AFP)

Amber Heard hugs her lawyer Elaine Bredehoft after the jury announced split verdicts. (Photo by EVELYN HOCKSTEIN / POOL / AFP)
Amber Heard hugs her lawyer Elaine Bredehoft after the jury announced split verdicts. (Photo by EVELYN HOCKSTEIN / POOL / AFP)
 

The 58-year-old Depp, who lost a libel case against the British tabloid The Sun in London in 2020 for calling him a “wife-beater,” celebrated the split verdict in the case as a victory while Heard said she was “heartbroken”.

Depp sued Heard over an op-ed she wrote for The Washington Post in December 2018 in which she described herself as a “public figure representing domestic abuse”.

The Texas-born Heard did not name Depp in the piece, but he sued her for implying he was a domestic abuser and sought $50 million in damages.

The 36-year-old Heard countersued for $100 million, saying she was defamed by statements made by Depp’s lawyer, Adam Waldman, who told the Daily Mail her abuse claims were a “hoax”.

Bredehoft said Depp’s legal team worked to “demonise” Heard and suppressed crucial evidence in the trial, preventing the jurors from examining evidence of Depp’s alleged abuse.

“A number of things were allowed in this court that should not have been allowed, and it caused the jury to be confused,” she said.

“We had an enormous amount of evidence that was suppressed in this case that was in the UK case,” she said.

“In the UK case when it came in, Amber won, Mr. Depp lost.”
 

Johnny Depp waves upon arrival at the Sage Gateshead venue, in Newcastle-upon-Tyne, north east England, on June 2 to appear on stage with British guitarist and musician Jeff Beck. (Photo by AFP)
Johnny Depp waves upon arrival at the Sage Gateshead venue, in Newcastle-upon-Tyne, north east England, on June 2 to appear on stage with British guitarist and musician Jeff Beck. (Photo by AFP)
 
Amber Heard departs the Fairfax County Courthouse on June 1. (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)
Amber Heard departs the Fairfax County Courthouse on June 1. (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)
 

The lawyer said the ruling bodes ill for the MeToo movement and will discourage women from reporting sexual harassment and abuse.

“It’s a horrible message,” Bredehoft said. “It’s a significant setback, because that’s exactly what it means.

“Unless you pull out your phone and you video your spouse or your significant other beating you, effectively you won’t be believed.”

Bredehoft was asked by TODAY about Heard’s immediate reaction to the verdict in the trial, which took place in Fairfax County Circuit Court near the US capital.

“One of the first things she said is that, ‘I am so sorry to all those women out there’,” she said. “This is a setback for all women in and outside the courtroom, and she feels the burden of that.”

In a statement, Heard said “the disappointment I feel today is beyond words”.

“I’m heartbroken that the mountain of evidence still was not enough to stand up to the disproportionate power, influence, and sway of my ex-husband,” she said.

For his part, Depp welcomed the verdict, saying “The jury gave me my life back”. “The best is yet to come and a new chapter has finally begun,” Depp said in a statement.

Bredehoft said social media may have had an impact on the case although jurors had been instructed not to look at it.

“There’s no way they couldn’t have been influenced by it, and it was horrible,” she said. “It really, really was lopsided.”

Heard’s lawyer also said she opposed having the trial televised. “I was against cameras in the courtroom, and I went on record with that and had argued against it because of the sensitive nature of this, but it made it a zoo,” she said.

— AFP

Author: Editors Desk

Source: News Corp Australia Network:

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.
You did not use the site, Click here to remain logged. Timeout: 60 second