Vidostream | News, sport and opinion from the Vidostream's US Edition

https://vidostream.com

Justice Dept. Seeks Censure of Judge, Widening Fight With Judiciary

A complaint said Judge James Boasberg, who clashed with the Trump administration over deportation plans, made “improper public comments” about President Trump.

A seated middle-aged man wears the black robes of a U.S. judge, an American flag visible behind him.
Judge James E. Boasberg in 2023.Credit...Erin Schaff/The New York Times

The Justice Department has filed a misconduct complaint against a federal judge who has ruled against President Trump’s deportation plans, the latest move in the administration’s broad pressure campaign on judges it believes are blocking the president’s priorities.

Attorney General Pam Bondi wrote on social media on Monday that the department had filed the complaint against Judge James E. Boasberg, the chief judge of the U.S. District Court in Washington, “for making improper public comments” about the president and his administration.

The complaint, a copy of which was obtained by The New York Times, cited comments it said Judge Boasberg made in March before Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and other judges at the Judicial Conference of the United States, which oversees the administration of the federal courts.

The complaint said that Judge Boasberg had told the gathering that he believed the Trump administration would “disregard rulings of federal courts” and trigger “a constitutional crisis.” His remarks, the complaint said, amounted to an attempt to “improperly influence Chief Justice Roberts” and have “undermined the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary.”

The Times could not independently verify the comments cited in the complaint. They were reported by The Federalist, a conservative website, which said it had obtained notes summarizing the closed-door meeting.

Judge Boasberg’s office did not immediately return a request for comment. He has been at the center of the administration’s attacks on the judiciary since ruling in March that it could not deport Venezuelan migrants to El Salvador under an 18th-century wartime law, the Alien Enemies Act. That ruling came days after the Judicial Conference meeting.

After the Trump administration proceeded with its plan to deport the migrants anyway, Judge Boasberg said the administration had defied his order. He tried to open a contempt investigation into the officials involved, but the proceedings were paused in April by the federal appeals court in Washington, where they have languished for months.

While the administration has mounted several attacks on the judiciary, including a highly unusual suit against 15 federal judges in Maryland, Judge Boasberg has been a particular focus of the president’s ire. Mr. Trump called for him to be impeached over the immigration case, an idea that was immediately rejected by Chief Justice Roberts, who issued a rare public statement saying impeachment was “not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision.”

Two months later, the Supreme Court kept in place an appeals court’s block on the Trump administration’s use of the Alien Enemies Act, which it has sought to use to deport migrants it accused of being gang members.

The complaint against Judge Boasberg was filed to Sri Srinivasan, the chief judge of the appeals court in Washington, which manages disciplinary proceedings for judges in its circuit. It requests that Judge Boasberg be removed from the deportations case and an investigation started. The Justice Department is seeking a public reprimand for the judge, and that he be referred to the Judicial Conference so it can consider recommending his impeachment.

The complaint is the latest move in the Trump administration’s fight with the nation’s justices.

In February, the Justice Department filed a misconduct complaint against the judge overseeing a challenge to Mr. Trump’s ban on transgender people in the military, accusing her of “hostile and egregious misconduct.”

Last month, it sued the Maryland judges, accusing them of intruding on the president’s inherent powers to “enforce the nation’s immigration laws.”

And earlier this month, Ms. Bondi accused members of the federal bench in New Jersey of being “rogue judges” during a fight over who would be the state’s next acting U.S. attorney.

Jonathan Wolfe is a Times reporter based in London, covering breaking news.

Author: Jonathan Wolfe

Source: N.Y Times

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.
You did not use the site, Click here to remain logged. Timeout: 60 second