Vidostream | News, sport and opinion from the Vidostream's US Edition

https://vidostream.com

Netanyahu’s forever war is killing Israel faster than its enemies

The ‘total victory’ the PM has set as his goal is impossible, with or without American support

US President Donald Trump greets Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. © Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

US President Donald Trump greets Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. © Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Robert Inlakesh is a political analyst, journalist and documentary filmmaker currently based in London, UK. He has reported from and lived in the Palestinian territories and currently works with Quds News. Director of ‘Steal of the Century: Trump's Palestine-Israel Catastrophe’. @falasteen47

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has trapped himself in a predicament that requires him to either bow out of power or drag his whole state down with him. In over 18 months, Israel has failed to defeat any of its enemies and escalation in Gaza could be the most dangerous decision he has taken yet.

While the Israeli prime minister insists on continuing the war on Gaza, holding to his pledge to “crush and destroy” Hamas, he has failed to do so and according to his own nation’s intelligence estimates, the victory he speaks of is nowhere in sight. Now, Netanyahu has declared a new military operation in the Gaza Strip, labelling it “Gideon’s Chariots,” allegedly seeking the re-occupation of the entirety of the besieged coastal territory.

Just prior to this, the US brokered a historic direct deal with Hamas to release an Israeli-American dual national, Idan Alexander; a soldier who had been taken as a prisoner of war on October 7, 2023. In return, Hamas say they were informed that the US was going to pressure Israel to allow in humanitarian aid to Gaza after an eight-week total blockade.

Instead of permitting the entrance of humanitarian aid, Israel decided to ramp up its bombing campaign, displacing over 300,000 Palestinians and killing around 300 in only 48 hours. Afterwards, Israeli PM Netanyahu stated publicly that even in the event that all the captives held in Gaza are returned, he will not end the war.

However, prior to US President Donald Trump’s trip to the Arabian Peninsula last week, a series of stories were published in the Israeli and international press, claiming that a major feud was brewing between Netanyahu and the American leader.

So the narrative went, anonymous sources claimed that Trump had cut off direct communication with his Israeli counterpart, and that he was snubbing Netanyahu by not visiting Israel during his trip to the region and even that he was going to recognize a Palestinian State.

Not only did Trump deny a schism between himself and Netanyahu in a recent Fox News interview, he even claimed that October 7, 2023, was one of the most violent days in history, which is, to say the least, a ridiculous assertion by any standard.

Then came Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s interview with CBS News this Saturday, where he stated that the US supports the destruction of Hamas, while also saying the US seeks a deal to allow the release of more Israeli captives. It is clear from his language that Rubio has adopted the same stance as Israel, and that the war won’t stop until Hamas is defeated; in other words, the Israeli soldiers being held captive in Gaza are not the reason for the war.

Anonymous claims of the US president standing up to Israel are not new. In December of 2023, former American President Joe Biden allegedly shouted at Netanyahu and hung up the phone, according to unnamed sources. Month after month, reports emerged about the so-called threats that Biden was issuing to the Israeli government. In October of 2024, headlines were even made of claims by Bob Woodward, in his book ‘War’, where he wrote that Biden called Netanyahu a “bad f***ing guy”  and a “f***ing liar”.

In April, it emerged through an Israeli Channel 13 investigative report that the Biden administration, which US media reported was “working tirelessly” for a ceasefire in Gaza, had never once pressured Israel to do so.

The truth is, if the US was to tell Israel to stop its war on Gaza, it would end tomorrow. It won’t. Every senior official in the Trump administration is a diehard supporter of Israel that has taken money from pro-Israel groups, while the Republican President’s campaign was bankrolled by Israel’s richest billionaire, Miriam Adelson.

Donald Trump speaks a big game when it comes to negotiating settlements to conflicts. One day he takes a breakthrough stance on an issue, before reverting back to the same exact positions the Biden administration held only a day later.

On the other hand, the Israeli prime minister appears to have shot himself in the foot after deciding to violate the US-fostered ceasefire agreement in Gaza. He did this by choosing the issue of blocking humanitarian aid as his hill to die on.

Although the Israeli military and coalition speak a big game when it comes to their options in Gaza, the reality is that their ground force is fatigued and ill-trained, having long lost motivation for the fight, and is not drawing enough men to carry out major operations without leaving Israel vulnerable on other fronts.

Therefore, the Israeli army has remained in the buffer zone areas in Gaza, as the political leadership took the decision to apply pressure through collectively punishing some 2 million civilians. Netanyahu pledged to prohibit all food, water, fuel and medical supplies from entering Gaza. It has now been over 80 days since that decision was made.

This blatant war crime, however, has provoked a significant international backlash and even forced the US to comment publicly that it is working on getting aid into Gaza. But there is one issue: Netanyahu’s right-wing coalition allies, belonging to the Religious Zionism Bloc, have begun threatening to leave the government if he lets food reach Palestinian civilians.

This meant that a show had to be put on, one in which the likes of Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich have been made to believe that their prime minister has lost favour with Donald Trump; the most loved political figure amongst Israelis. In this theater, the Israeli public were convinced that significant pressure had been applied on Netanyahu to reach a ceasefire agreement.

So what does Netanyahu do now? He launches a new military operation against Gaza, knowing it will have no teeth and will simply target civilians and the territory’s remaining infrastructure, while limited incursions will also take place. Meanwhile, the Israeli leader will also appear to be standing up to the US in rejecting a ceasefire, while trickles of aid trucks slowly enter Gaza in a way that won’t trigger a major backlash.

But Benjamin Netanyahu won’t finish there, he wants to show that he has taken on all of Israel’s enemies on every single front, and so Iran is at the top of his list of priorities. Finally, after 18 months of one of the most appalling civilian bloodbaths in modern history, the European nations are beginning to change their tone regarding the starvation policy being inflicted on Gaza, now combined with a renewed ground offensive.

When we look at the predicament of Gaza, it cannot be separated from the other fronts. The war with Hezbollah in Lebanon is far from over, although it is only Israel that is bombing Lebanese territory for now. While Western officials and think-tanks claim that Hezbollah has been defeated and crushed, the reality is that it is nowhere near over. In fact, the events that have taken place since last September have only been used by the group to energize its base in a way we haven’t seen since the early 2000s.

As for Yemen, the US was defeated by Ansarallah (the Houthis), despite the disparity between the sides. Ultimately, Washington was forced to concede that anything short of a ground invasion would fail to deter the Yemeni Armed Forces (YAF) from fighting Israel.

The only way this war ends is with a showdown between Iran and Israel. It is unlikely that the US will seek to engage in an all-out war with the Islamic Republic, understanding well that this will come at an enormous cost to its troops, bases and allies in the region. Therefore, it is much more conceivable that this conflict will be controlled to one extent or another. After all, the massive investments pledged by Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the UAE, didn’t come for free; they all seek security in return.

Staring directly at a dead end in Gaza, the Israeli government of Benjamin Netanyahu has only one way out if it seeks to escalate further: a series of strikes targeting the Iranian nuclear program.

The Iranian air defences have not been degraded, as Washington-based think tanks and the Israeli leadership claim was the result of their last attack on the country. This does not mean, however, that the Israelis don’t have the capabilities to strike nuclear sites, they clearly do. Assuming they use conventional weapons to do so, it could potentially set the program back a few years.

If the Israeli attack is limited and the US only plays a support role, Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) will most likely limit its strikes to military sites and perhaps infrastructure like the power grid and/or ports. This would effectively ground, or at least degrade the capabilities of the Israeli air force, leaving an opening for Hezbollah to liberate the south of their country from occupation and restore their prestige following the tactical losses inflicted upon them.

The big question mark here are the dozen or so armed groups based in the Gaza Strip. If Israel is having to concentrate its ground forces in the north and its air force is not operating at full capacity, there is the potential for a Hamas move that no other regional player would dare take.

Considering the aforementioned scenario, it is conceivable that there is a way for Israel and the US to launch a battle against Iran which could close every front of the war, but there are two major issues that even get in the way of this: Netanyahu’s personal calculations for remaining in power and the predicament of Gaza. 

Israel is seeking to implement a plan to militarize and privatize the distribution of aid to Gaza’s civilian population, an initiative that the United Nations and rights groups have strongly opposed. Perhaps they believe that this will help facilitate their push towards ethnically cleansing the Palestinians from the besieged coastal territory, yet Egypt and other surrounding nations still refuse this as an option.

Then comes the idea of Israeli forces occupying Gaza internally, which would be so incredible even if they could, that discussing the ins and outs of it would be a worthless endeavour. Israel has refused to actually fight the dozen or so Palestinian armed factions, which is why it has managed to keep its soldier casualties low and also explains why not a single one of the groups has been defeated. Even smaller groups like the Salah al-Deen Brigades, Mujahideen Brigades and Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades are still standing.

“Total victory”, as the Israeli prime minister claims is his goal, is not possible. If he chooses to continue carrying on in the way he is today, he could end up provoking an escalation on one of the fronts that suddenly results in total defeat.

Traumatized, frustrated and longing for revenge, these are the attitudes felt by millions across the region. An unexpected development in the West Bank, Syria, East Jerusalem or even on the domestic front from within the deeply divided Israeli society, all could spell disaster for Netanyahu.

Despite all of the countless vulnerabilities, which extend beyond what is mentioned here, the US continues to give its Israeli allies carte blanche to commit whatever aggression they choose. At this stage, Washington is not a friend of Israel’s, it is its official hype man, supplying an endless stream of bombs and failing to consider how quickly the situation could explode. This was the exact same thinking that caught the US and Israel with their pants down on October 7, 2023, except the stakes are now much higher.

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.

Author: Editors Desk

Source: rt.com

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.
You did not use the site, Click here to remain logged. Timeout: 60 second